Skip to main content

Frequently Asked Questions

Freedom of speech is the right of a person to articulate opinions and ideas without interference or retaliation from the government. The term “speech” constitutes expression that includes far more than just words, but also what a person wears, reads, performs, protests and more. Below are some frequently asked questions regarding Freedom of Speech.

Yes, but any restrictions must be content-neutral and narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest. This generally means the University can regulate the time, place, and manner of speech to ensure minimal interference with campus operations and access.

The Supreme Court allows public entities, like the University, to regulate the "time, place, and manner" of speech. As a publicly funded institution, the University designates specific spaces for free speech. This includes managing resources such as staff time, space, and public safety, all while balancing its educational mission with legal obligations.

University policy cannot override the Constitution. Restricting speech based solely on its controversial nature jeopardizes everyone's rights. The same laws protecting controversial speech also safeguard the rights of those advocating for peace, justice, fairness, and equality.

The University is committed to protecting the free exchange of ideas. Academic freedom requires that all ideas be given a fair chance to succeed or fail on their own merit. The University remains neutral, ensuring equal safety and respect for all speakers. As Thomas Jefferson said, "here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead, nor to tolerate any error so long as reason is left free to combat it."

SUNY Fredonia supports a safe environment for all constitutionally protected speech, regardless of content. The University encourages discussion and debate on controversial topics through forums and symposia.

Freedom of speech and academic freedom can be challenging, especially when faced with ideas that offend or contradict personal beliefs. Critics cannot silence speech they disagree with. You have the right to respond with your own protected speech—talking, distributing literature, displaying signs, or singing—but you cannot threaten, harm, or create a situation where the speaker cannot be heard. Ignoring a controversial speaker is also a valid form of dissent, denying them the attention they seek.